What Is Synthetic Monitoring? Simple Explanation for Developers
Synthetic monitoring simulates user interactions to test availability and performance. Learn how it differs from real user monitoring and when to use each approach.
Wakestack Team
Engineering Team
Synthetic monitoring uses simulated requests to test your website, API, or application's availability and performance. Instead of waiting for real users to encounter problems, synthetic monitoring proactively checks your services from multiple locations on a schedule—every 30 seconds to 5 minutes.
Think of it as automated QA that runs 24/7.
How Synthetic Monitoring Works
Synthetic Monitoring Process:
────────────────────────────────────────────────────
┌─── US East Server
│ "Send GET /api/users"
Monitoring Schedule ────┼─── EU Server
(every 30 seconds) │ "Send GET /api/users"
└─── Asia Server
"Send GET /api/users"
↓
Collect Results:
• Status code: 200 OK
• Response time: 145ms
• Content valid: Yes
↓
If failure → Alert
If slow → Alert
If success → Log & continue
The monitoring system:
- Sends requests from multiple geographic locations
- Validates responses against expected criteria
- Measures response time
- Alerts when something is wrong
- Records data for historical analysis
Types of Synthetic Monitoring
1. Availability Monitoring (Uptime Checks)
Simple checks that verify services respond:
- HTTP/HTTPS requests
- TCP port checks
- DNS resolution
- Ping (ICMP)
Example: Check if https://api.example.com/health returns 200 OK
2. API Monitoring
More sophisticated API testing:
- Multiple endpoint checks
- Response validation
- Header verification
- JSON schema validation
Example: Verify /api/users returns valid JSON with expected fields
3. Browser/Transaction Monitoring
Scripted user journeys using headless browsers:
- Login flows
- Checkout processes
- Multi-step forms
- Visual regression
Example: Script that logs in, adds item to cart, and completes checkout
Synthetic vs Real User Monitoring (RUM)
| Aspect | Synthetic | Real User Monitoring |
|---|---|---|
| Traffic | Simulated/fake | Actual users |
| When it works | 24/7, even with no users | Only when users visit |
| Coverage | Specific paths you define | All user interactions |
| Consistency | Same tests every time | Varies by user behavior |
| Catches issues | Before users see them | As users experience them |
| Data | Controlled environment | Real-world conditions |
When to Use Each
Use Synthetic Monitoring:
- Proactive availability checking
- Consistent baseline performance data
- Testing from multiple regions
- Off-hours monitoring (when no users online)
- Pre-production testing
Use Real User Monitoring:
- Understanding actual user experience
- Discovering unexpected usage patterns
- Geographic performance variations
- Device/browser-specific issues
- Conversion funnel analysis
Many teams use both.
Benefits of Synthetic Monitoring
1. Proactive Issue Detection
Find problems before users do:
- 2 AM outage detected instantly
- No need to wait for complaints
- Faster mean time to detection
2. Consistent Baselines
Same test, same locations, same conditions:
- Track performance over time
- Detect gradual degradation
- Compare releases objectively
3. Geographic Coverage
Test from locations matching your users:
- Detect regional outages
- Measure latency from different continents
- Verify CDN performance
4. No Dependency on Traffic
Works even when:
- No users are online
- It's 3 AM in your timezone
- You're just launching (no traffic yet)
Common Mistakes
1. Only Testing the Homepage
Your homepage might work while critical paths fail:
- Test
/api/healthfor APIs - Test
/loginfor authentication - Test
/checkoutfor e-commerce
2. Single-Location Testing
One location can't detect regional issues and produces false positives from local network problems.
Use at least 3 locations.
3. Ignoring Response Time
A 200 OK that takes 30 seconds is effectively down. Set thresholds:
Warning: > 2 seconds
Critical: > 5 seconds
4. Alert Fatigue
Too many alerts = ignored alerts. Configure:
- 2-3 consecutive failures before alerting
- Reasonable thresholds
- Proper escalation
5. Not Testing User Journeys
Simple uptime checks miss complex failures. If checkout requires login + cart + payment, a simple HTTP check might miss issues in that flow.
Synthetic Monitoring Tools Comparison
| Tool | Uptime | API Testing | Browser Tests | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wakestack | Yes | Basic | No | $0-99/mo |
| UptimeRobot | Yes | Basic | No | $0-50/mo |
| Pingdom | Yes | Yes | Yes | $15+/mo |
| Datadog | Yes | Yes | Yes | Variable |
| Checkly | Yes | Yes | Yes (Playwright) | $30+/mo |
For most teams, uptime monitoring (simple synthetic checks) is sufficient. Browser testing is valuable for complex user flows.
When Wakestack Is a Good Fit
Wakestack provides synthetic monitoring (uptime checks) combined with server monitoring and status pages:
- HTTP/HTTPS checks from multiple regions
- TCP, DNS, Ping monitoring
- 30-second intervals for fast detection
- Response validation including content matching
- Server metrics to understand why failures occur
- Status pages to communicate with users
What Wakestack Covers
| Synthetic Monitoring Type | Wakestack |
|---|---|
| Availability (uptime) | ✓ |
| API endpoint checks | ✓ |
| SSL monitoring | ✓ |
| Multi-region | ✓ |
| Browser/transaction tests | ✗ |
For browser testing, consider dedicated tools like Checkly or Playwright. For availability monitoring with server visibility, Wakestack fits well.
Start synthetic monitoring — 5 free monitors, no credit card.
Quick Setup
- Sign up at wakestack.co.uk/signup
- Add monitors for your critical endpoints:
- Homepage
- API health endpoint
- Authentication
- Key user paths
- Configure multi-region checks
- Set alert thresholds appropriate for each endpoint
- Create status page to communicate with users
Key Takeaways
- Synthetic monitoring uses simulated requests to test services
- It catches issues before real users encounter them
- Uptime monitoring is a form of synthetic monitoring
- Use it alongside (not instead of) real user monitoring
- Test critical paths, not just the homepage
- Use multiple geographic locations
Related Resources
Frequently Asked Questions
What is synthetic monitoring?
Synthetic monitoring uses simulated requests to test your website or API's availability and performance. Unlike real user monitoring (RUM), it doesn't require actual users—automated scripts check your services from multiple locations on a schedule.
What's the difference between synthetic and real user monitoring?
Synthetic monitoring uses fake/simulated traffic to proactively test services. Real user monitoring (RUM) collects data from actual users. Synthetic catches issues before users see them; RUM shows what real users experience.
Is uptime monitoring the same as synthetic monitoring?
Uptime monitoring is a form of synthetic monitoring—it uses simulated requests to check if services are available. The term 'synthetic monitoring' often includes more complex tests like scripted user journeys, while 'uptime monitoring' typically refers to simpler availability checks.
Related Articles
Global Uptime Monitoring: Why Single-Location Checks Aren't Enough
Learn why global multi-region uptime monitoring matters. Detect regional outages, reduce false positives, and understand your worldwide availability.
Read morePingdom Alternative: Modern Uptime Monitoring Without Enterprise Pricing
Looking for a Pingdom alternative? Compare Wakestack vs Pingdom for uptime monitoring, status pages, and server monitoring. Get enterprise features without enterprise pricing.
Read moreUptime Monitoring: The Complete Guide for 2026
Learn everything about uptime monitoring - what it is, why it matters, how to set it up, and which tools to use. A comprehensive guide for DevOps teams and developers.
Read moreReady to monitor your uptime?
Start monitoring your websites, APIs, and services in minutes. Free forever for small projects.