Pingdom Alternative: Modern Uptime Monitoring Without Enterprise Pricing

Who This Is For

This guide is for engineering teams and technical decision-makers who use Pingdom but feel they're overpaying for features they don't use, or who are concerned about SolarWinds ownership.

If you want enterprise-grade uptime monitoring without enterprise complexity and pricing, this comparison will help you evaluate Wakestack as a Pingdom alternative.

Quick Comparison: Wakestack vs Pingdom

When Wakestack Is Better

1. You Want Status Pages Included

Pingdom treats status pages as a completely separate product with separate pricing. You'll pay for:

• Pingdom Synthetic Monitoring: $15+/mo
• Pingdom Status Pages: Additional subscription

Wakestack includes beautiful, customizable status pages in every plan. No add-ons, no surprise charges.

2. You Need Server Monitoring

Pingdom monitors external endpoints—it can't see inside your servers. When something goes wrong, you know that it's down but not why.

Wakestack's lightweight Go agent monitors:

• CPU, memory, and disk usage
• Running processes
• Custom metrics
• All integrated with your uptime data

3. You Want Simpler Pricing

Pingdom's pricing is notoriously complex:

• Base synthetic monitoring fee
• Per-check fees for advanced checks
• Separate RUM pricing
• Separate status page pricing
• API monitoring pricing

Wakestack has three tiers: Free, Pro ($29/mo), Enterprise ($99/mo). Everything is included.

4. You're Concerned About SolarWinds

The 2020 SolarWinds supply chain attack affected thousands of organizations. While SolarWinds has strengthened security since then, some teams prefer not to have SolarWinds in their supply chain.

Wakestack is an independent company with no SolarWinds connection.

5. You Don't Need RUM or Transaction Monitoring

If you're only using Pingdom for:

• HTTP/HTTPS uptime checks
• SSL certificate monitoring
• DNS monitoring
• Basic API checks

You're probably paying for features you don't use. Wakestack focuses on these core use cases at a lower price point.

When Pingdom Is Better

1. You Need Real User Monitoring (RUM)

Pingdom's RUM product measures actual user experience:

• Page load times from real visitors
• Geographic performance breakdown
• Browser and device analytics

Wakestack focuses on synthetic (simulated) monitoring. If you need RUM, you'll need Pingdom or a dedicated RUM tool.

2. You Need Transaction Monitoring

Pingdom can script complex user journeys:

• Login flows
• Checkout processes
• Multi-step forms

Wakestack monitors endpoints, not user flows. For transaction monitoring, consider Pingdom or dedicated tools like Checkly.

3. You're in a Large Enterprise with SolarWinds

If your organization already uses SolarWinds products (Network Performance Monitor, Server & Application Monitor), Pingdom integrates into that ecosystem.

4. You Need 50+ Monitors on Budget

Pingdom's pricing scales better at high volumes. For 100+ monitors, Pingdom can be cheaper than Wakestack Enterprise.

Limitations of Wakestack (Honest Assessment)

• No RUM: We don't measure real user page load times.
• No transaction monitoring: We can't script login or checkout flows.
• Shorter track record: Pingdom has been around since 2007. We're newer.
• Smaller enterprise feature set: No advanced SAML, audit logs, or compliance certifications (coming soon).

Feature Deep Dive

Uptime Monitoring

Status Pages

Server Monitoring

Advanced Features

Pricing Comparison

For a small team (20 monitors + status page):

For a growing company (50 monitors + status page + server monitoring):

For enterprise (100+ monitors):

Migration Guide

1. Audit your Pingdom usage

   • Which checks are actually used?
   • Do you use RUM or transaction monitoring?
   • What alert channels are configured?

2. Sign up for Wakestack at wakestack.co.uk/signup

3. Recreate your HTTP/TCP/DNS checks

   • Export from Pingdom or recreate manually
   • Configure alert thresholds

4. Set up your status page

   • Map your Pingdom components
   • Configure subscriber notifications

5. Install server agents (optional)

   curl -sSL https://wakestack.co.uk/install.sh | bash

6. Run parallel monitoring for 1-2 weeks before switching over

Common Migration Concerns

"Will I lose uptime history?"

Yes, historical data doesn't migrate. Consider:

• Exporting reports from Pingdom before canceling
• Running both tools in parallel during transition
• Starting fresh (most teams only look back 30-90 days anyway)

"What about RUM?"

If you actively use Pingdom RUM, you have options:

• Keep Pingdom just for RUM
• Switch to a dedicated RUM tool (SpeedCurve, Raygun)
• Use your APM's RUM features (if applicable)

"Is Wakestack reliable enough?"

Wakestack runs on redundant cloud infrastructure with multiple monitoring regions. We publish our own uptime at status.wakestack.co.uk. Our architecture is designed for 99.99% availability.

Try Wakestack Free

See why teams are choosing Wakestack as their Pingdom alternative.

• 5 monitors included free
• Status page included
• Server monitoring included
• No credit card required

Start Your Free Trial →

Not sure if Wakestack is right? Compare all features or read our documentation.

Related Resources

• Best Uptime Monitoring Tools in 2026
• UptimeRobot Alternative
• Better Stack Alternative