Better Stack Alternative: Wakestack for Teams Who Need Server Monitoring
Looking for a Better Stack alternative with server monitoring? Compare Wakestack vs Better Stack (Better Uptime) for uptime monitoring, incident management, and infrastructure monitoring.
Wakestack Team
Engineering Team
Who This Is For
This guide is for DevOps teams and platform engineers who use Better Stack (formerly Better Uptime) but need visibility into their server infrastructure—not just external endpoints.
If you're finding that Better Stack tells you that something is down but not why, and you're tired of SSHing into servers to diagnose issues, Wakestack might be a better fit.
Quick Comparison: Wakestack vs Better Stack
| Feature | Wakestack | Better Stack |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $29/mo | $29/mo per seat |
| Free Tier | 5 monitors | 10 monitors |
| Min Check Interval | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Status Pages | Included | Included |
| Server Monitoring | Yes (Go agent) | No |
| On-Call Scheduling | No | Yes |
| Incident Management | Built-in | Advanced |
| Log Management | No | Yes (separate product) |
| Pricing Model | Per monitors | Per seat |
When Wakestack Is Better
1. You Need to Know WHY Things Break
Better Stack excels at telling you when your endpoints are down. But when the alert fires, you're left guessing:
- Is it the application?
- Database connection pool exhausted?
- Server out of memory?
- Disk full?
Wakestack's server agent gives you immediate context. When an endpoint goes down, you can see:
- CPU spike at 98% at the same time
- Memory exhaustion
- Disk at 100%
- Specific processes consuming resources
This reduces your mean time to resolution (MTTR) significantly.
2. You Want Simpler Pricing
Better Stack charges per seat. A 5-person team pays $145/month just for Pro monitoring.
Wakestack charges per monitors, not per user. Your whole team can access the dashboard for one price:
- Pro: $29/mo for 50 monitors
- Enterprise: $99/mo for unlimited monitors
For teams larger than 1 person, this is often significantly cheaper.
3. You Monitor Infrastructure, Not Just URLs
If you're monitoring:
- Bare metal servers
- VPS instances
- Self-hosted applications
- Docker hosts
- Kubernetes nodes
Wakestack's agent-based monitoring provides infrastructure visibility that Better Stack's external-only approach can't match.
4. You Prefer Hierarchical Organization
Wakestack lets you nest monitors under hosts:
Production Cluster
├── API Server 1
│ ├── Health endpoint
│ ├── CPU/Memory/Disk
│ └── Process: node
├── API Server 2
│ └── ...
└── Database Server
├── TCP port 5432
└── CPU/Memory/Disk
This infrastructure-aware approach helps you understand blast radius during incidents.
When Better Stack Is Better
1. You Need Built-In On-Call Scheduling
Better Stack includes on-call schedules, rotations, and escalation policies. If you don't have PagerDuty or Opsgenie and need this functionality, Better Stack provides it out of the box.
Wakestack integrates with PagerDuty and Opsgenie but doesn't have native on-call scheduling.
2. You Want Integrated Log Management
Better Stack (through Logtail) offers log management that integrates with their uptime product. If you want logs and uptime in the same platform, Better Stack provides that.
Wakestack focuses on monitoring and status pages, leaving logging to dedicated tools.
3. You Only Monitor External Endpoints
If you only need to monitor public URLs and APIs without caring about server internals, Better Stack's focused approach works well. You won't use Wakestack's server monitoring features.
4. You're a Single-Person Team
Better Stack's per-seat pricing makes sense for solo operators. At $29/month for one seat, you get excellent uptime monitoring with incident management included.
Limitations of Wakestack (Honest Assessment)
- No on-call scheduling: You'll need PagerDuty, Opsgenie, or similar for rotation management.
- No log management: We don't collect or analyze logs—use Datadog, Logtail, or similar.
- Simpler incident management: Better Stack has more advanced incident features like postmortem templates and SLA tracking.
Feature Deep Dive
Server Monitoring
| Capability | Wakestack | Better Stack |
|---|---|---|
| CPU monitoring | Yes | No |
| Memory monitoring | Yes | No |
| Disk monitoring | Yes | No |
| Process monitoring | Yes | No |
| Custom metrics | Yes | No |
| Agent deployment | Single binary | N/A |
Status Pages
| Capability | Wakestack | Better Stack |
|---|---|---|
| Included | Yes | Yes |
| Custom domain | Pro | Pro |
| Custom branding | Yes | Yes |
| Subscriber notifications | Yes | Yes |
| Password protection | Yes | Yes |
Incident Management
| Capability | Wakestack | Better Stack |
|---|---|---|
| Incident creation | Yes | Yes |
| Status updates | Yes | Yes |
| Postmortem templates | Basic | Advanced |
| On-call scheduling | No | Yes |
| Escalation policies | No | Yes |
| SLA tracking | No | Yes |
Pricing Comparison
For a 5-person DevOps team:
| Solution | Monthly Cost |
|---|---|
| Better Stack Pro (5 seats) | $145/mo |
| Wakestack Pro | $29/mo |
For a solo founder:
| Solution | Monthly Cost |
|---|---|
| Better Stack Pro (1 seat) | $29/mo |
| Wakestack Pro | $29/mo |
At the same price, Wakestack adds server monitoring. Better Stack adds on-call scheduling.
Migration Guide
- Export your monitors from Better Stack
- Sign up for Wakestack at wakestack.co.uk/signup
- Recreate your monitors (HTTP, TCP, DNS, Ping)
- Install the server agent on your infrastructure:
curl -sSL https://wakestack.co.uk/install.sh | bash - Create your status page with the same components
- Configure PagerDuty integration if you need on-call (optional)
Ideal Use Cases
Choose Wakestack if you:
- Run your own servers (VPS, bare metal, or cloud VMs)
- Need to understand infrastructure health alongside uptime
- Have a team larger than 2 people
- Want simpler, predictable pricing
- Can use PagerDuty or similar for on-call
Choose Better Stack if you:
- Only monitor external endpoints
- Need built-in on-call scheduling
- Want integrated log management
- Are a solo operator
- Prefer all-in-one incident management
Try Wakestack Free
See if Wakestack is the right Better Stack alternative for your infrastructure monitoring needs.
- 5 monitors included free
- Server monitoring agent included
- Status page included
- No credit card required
Questions? Check our documentation or compare plans.
Related Resources
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between Wakestack and Better Stack?
The main difference is server monitoring. Wakestack includes a Go agent for monitoring CPU, memory, disk, and processes. Better Stack focuses on external monitoring and incident management without infrastructure visibility.
Is Wakestack cheaper than Better Stack?
Both have similar pricing at $29/mo for Pro plans. However, Wakestack includes server monitoring in that price, while Better Stack charges per seat, making it more expensive for teams.
Does Wakestack have on-call scheduling like Better Stack?
Wakestack focuses on monitoring and alerting rather than on-call scheduling. If on-call rotations are critical, you may want to pair Wakestack with a dedicated tool like PagerDuty.
Related Articles
Pingdom Alternative: Modern Uptime Monitoring Without Enterprise Pricing
Looking for a Pingdom alternative? Compare Wakestack vs Pingdom for uptime monitoring, status pages, and server monitoring. Get enterprise features without enterprise pricing.
Read moreUptimeRobot Alternative: Why Teams Are Switching to Wakestack
Looking for an UptimeRobot alternative? Compare Wakestack vs UptimeRobot for uptime monitoring, status pages, and server monitoring. See why teams are making the switch.
Read moreBest Uptime Monitoring Tools in 2026: Complete Comparison
Compare the best uptime monitoring tools available in 2026. We analyze pricing, features, and use cases for Wakestack, Pingdom, UptimeRobot, Better Stack, and more.
Read moreReady to monitor your uptime?
Start monitoring your websites, APIs, and services in minutes. Free forever for small projects.