Wakestack vs UptimeRobot: Which Should You Choose?
Both Wakestack and UptimeRobot offer uptime monitoring, but they take different approaches. Here's an honest comparison to help you decide.
Wakestack Team
Engineering Team
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Wakestack | UptimeRobot |
|---|---|---|
| Uptime Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Server Monitoring | Yes (agent-based) | No |
| Free Tier | Yes (limited) | Yes (50 monitors) |
| Check Interval | From 1 minute | 5 min (free), 1 min (paid) |
| Status Pages | Yes | Yes (basic free, advanced paid) |
| Multi-location | Yes | Yes |
| Alerting | Slack, email, webhooks | Many integrations |
| Best For | Server + uptime combo | Pure uptime monitoring |
What Each Tool Does
Wakestack
Wakestack is a combined monitoring platform:
- Server monitoring: Install an agent, see CPU, memory, disk, network
- Uptime monitoring: External checks for availability
- Status pages: Public/private pages for incident communication
It's designed to answer both "is it up?" and "why is it slow/down?"
UptimeRobot
UptimeRobot is focused uptime monitoring:
- HTTP/HTTPS checks: Verify websites respond
- Keyword monitoring: Check for specific content
- Port monitoring: TCP port availability
- Status pages: Basic public status pages
It's designed to answer "is it up?" and nothing more.
Pricing Comparison
UptimeRobot
Free Tier:
- 50 monitors
- 5-minute check intervals
- Basic status page
- Email and webhook alerts
Pro ($7/month):
- 50 monitors (additional tiers available)
- 1-minute intervals
- More alert integrations
- Custom status page domain
Enterprise ($35+/month):
- More monitors
- Advanced features
- Priority support
Wakestack
Free Tier:
- Limited hosts
- Basic features
- Good for getting started
Paid Plans:
- Scale with number of hosts
- Full server + uptime monitoring
- Status pages included
- No per-monitor charges
Comparison: For pure uptime monitoring, UptimeRobot's free tier is hard to beat. For combined server + uptime, Wakestack's paid plans offer more value.
When to Choose UptimeRobot
You only need uptime monitoring
If your needs are:
- Know when websites are down
- Know when APIs are unreachable
- Simple status page
UptimeRobot does this well, especially on the free tier.
You have zero budget
UptimeRobot's free tier offers:
- 50 monitors (plenty for most small projects)
- 5-minute intervals (acceptable for many use cases)
- Basic alerting
You can't beat free.
You're monitoring third-party services
For checking services you don't control:
- Payment provider status
- External API availability
- Partner integrations
UptimeRobot works great—you don't need server metrics for third-party services.
You want mature, established tooling
UptimeRobot has been around since 2010:
- Proven reliability
- Large user base
- Well-documented
- Stable feature set
It's a known quantity.
When to Choose Wakestack
You need server monitoring too
If you want to know:
- Is CPU spiking on my server?
- Is disk filling up?
- Is memory running low?
Wakestack provides this alongside uptime. UptimeRobot doesn't.
You want unified visibility
With Wakestack:
- One dashboard for server health and availability
- Correlate uptime issues with server metrics
- Fewer tools to manage
Instead of UptimeRobot + another server monitoring tool, you use one tool.
You want better diagnostics
When an uptime check fails, Wakestack can help you understand why:
- Server metrics show resource exhaustion
- Historical data shows patterns
- Combined view aids troubleshooting
UptimeRobot tells you something is down. You investigate separately.
You're running your own infrastructure
If you manage servers (cloud VMs, bare metal, containers):
- You need visibility into those servers
- Uptime alone isn't enough
- Server metrics prevent problems before they cause downtime
You want more integrated status pages
Wakestack's status pages:
- Connect directly to monitoring data
- Update automatically based on checks
- Part of the unified platform
UptimeRobot's status pages work but are more basic, especially on free tier.
Feature Deep Dive
Uptime Monitoring
| Capability | Wakestack | UptimeRobot |
|---|---|---|
| HTTP/HTTPS checks | Yes | Yes |
| Keyword verification | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-location | Yes | Yes |
| 1-minute intervals | Yes | Paid only |
| SSL expiry alerts | Yes | Yes |
Verdict: Both are capable. UptimeRobot's free tier offers more monitors; Wakestack includes faster intervals.
Server Monitoring
| Capability | Wakestack | UptimeRobot |
|---|---|---|
| CPU metrics | Yes | No |
| Memory metrics | Yes | No |
| Disk metrics | Yes | No |
| Network metrics | Yes | No |
| Process monitoring | Yes | No |
Verdict: Wakestack wins here—UptimeRobot doesn't do server monitoring.
Status Pages
| Capability | Wakestack | UptimeRobot |
|---|---|---|
| Basic status page | Yes | Yes (free) |
| Custom domain | Yes | Paid |
| Incident management | Yes | Basic |
| Component grouping | Yes | Yes |
Verdict: Comparable, with slight edge to Wakestack for integration with server data.
Alerting
| Capability | Wakestack | UptimeRobot |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Yes | |
| Slack | Yes | Yes (paid) |
| Webhooks | Yes | Yes |
| PagerDuty | Via webhook | Yes |
| Many integrations | Limited | More options |
Verdict: UptimeRobot has more built-in integrations; Wakestack covers common channels.
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Freelancer with 5 client sites
Need: Know when client sites go down
Recommendation: UptimeRobot (free tier)
- 5 monitors out of 50 free
- 5-minute intervals are fine
- No cost
Scenario 2: Startup with 10 servers and a public API
Need: Server health + API availability + public status page
Recommendation: Wakestack
- Server monitoring shows resource issues
- Uptime monitoring covers API
- Status page included
- Unified view
Scenario 3: Agency monitoring 50 client websites
Need: Many uptime monitors, basic alerting
Recommendation: UptimeRobot Pro
- Purpose-built for this use case
- Per-monitor pricing makes sense
- No server monitoring needed
Scenario 4: Small team with 5 servers hosting a SaaS
Need: Server metrics, uptime, status page for customers
Recommendation: Wakestack
- Combined monitoring
- Server insights help debug issues
- Status page builds customer trust
Migration Considerations
Moving from UptimeRobot to Wakestack
What you'll gain:
- Server monitoring
- Unified dashboard
- Better diagnostic capability
What you might miss:
- UptimeRobot's specific integrations
- Familiarity with UptimeRobot's interface
- Free tier for many monitors
When it makes sense: When you need server visibility, not just uptime.
Keeping Both
Some teams use:
- UptimeRobot for external uptime monitoring
- Wakestack for server monitoring
This works but adds complexity. Wakestack's uptime monitoring might make UptimeRobot redundant.
Honest Assessment
Where UptimeRobot Wins
- Free tier: 50 monitors, no cost—unbeatable for pure uptime
- Focus: Does uptime monitoring and does it well
- Integrations: More built-in options
- Track record: Established, proven, reliable
Where Wakestack Wins
- Server monitoring: UptimeRobot doesn't have it
- Combined view: One tool for both uptime and server health
- Diagnostics: Understanding why, not just that
- Value for server owners: If you need server metrics anyway, Wakestack bundles uptime
The Bottom Line
UptimeRobot is excellent if you only need uptime monitoring. The free tier is generous, the tool is reliable, and it's been doing this for over a decade.
Wakestack makes sense if you want server monitoring alongside uptime. Instead of UptimeRobot + server monitoring tool, you get one unified platform.
If you're managing servers, Wakestack provides more value. If you're just checking if websites are up, UptimeRobot's free tier is hard to beat.
Summary
Choose UptimeRobot if:
- You only need uptime monitoring
- You want a generous free tier
- You're monitoring sites you don't host
- You prefer established tooling
Choose Wakestack if:
- You need server monitoring too
- You want one tool instead of two
- You're running your own infrastructure
- You value unified diagnostics
Both tools are good at what they do. The choice depends on whether you need visibility into servers or just need to know when websites are down.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Wakestack better than UptimeRobot?
It depends on your needs. Wakestack includes server monitoring alongside uptime checks. UptimeRobot focuses purely on uptime with a generous free tier. Choose based on whether you need server visibility.
Should I use UptimeRobot's free tier or pay for Wakestack?
If you only need basic uptime monitoring and have limited budget, UptimeRobot's free tier is great. If you also need server metrics (CPU, memory, disk) or want status pages with more features, Wakestack's paid plans provide more value.
Can I use both Wakestack and UptimeRobot?
Yes, some teams use UptimeRobot for external uptime checks and Wakestack for server monitoring. However, Wakestack includes uptime monitoring, so using both may be redundant.
Related Articles
Best Monitoring Tools for Small Infrastructure Teams
Small teams need monitoring that provides visibility without requiring a dedicated ops person. Here are the best tools for teams of 1-10 engineers.
Read moreBest Uptime Monitoring Tools for Startups (2026 Guide)
Startups need uptime monitoring that's affordable, easy to set up, and scales with growth. Here are the best tools for early-stage teams.
Read moreBest Uptime Monitoring Tools in 2026: Complete Comparison
Compare the best uptime monitoring tools available in 2026. We analyze pricing, features, and use cases for Wakestack, Pingdom, UptimeRobot, Better Stack, and more.
Read moreReady to monitor your uptime?
Start monitoring your websites, APIs, and services in minutes. Free forever for small projects.