How to Build an Incident Timeline from Monitoring Data
When incidents happen, understanding the sequence of events is crucial. Learn how to use monitoring data to construct accurate incident timelines for faster resolution and better postmortems.
Wakestack Team
Engineering Team
Why Incident Timelines Matter
During an incident, things happen fast. After resolution, memories blur:
- "When did the alerts start?"
- "Did the deploy happen before or after the errors?"
- "How long were users affected?"
An incident timeline provides objective answers. It's essential for:
- During the incident: Understanding what's happening and when
- After resolution: Calculating impact duration
- Postmortem: Identifying root cause and contributing factors
- Prevention: Understanding patterns across incidents
Anatomy of an Incident Timeline
A good timeline captures:
TIME | EVENT TYPE | DESCRIPTION
-----------|----------------|------------------------------------------
14:23:15 | CHANGE | Deploy v2.3.1 to production
14:23:45 | METRIC | Error rate increases from 0.1% to 2%
14:24:00 | ALERT | High error rate alert triggered
14:24:30 | METRIC | CPU usage spikes to 95%
14:25:00 | RESPONSE | On-call engineer acknowledges alert
14:27:00 | INVESTIGATION | Identifies recent deploy as potential cause
14:28:00 | ACTION | Rollback initiated to v2.3.0
14:30:00 | METRIC | Error rate returns to 0.1%
14:30:30 | ALERT | High error rate alert resolved
14:31:00 | VERIFICATION | Confirmed service healthy
Building the Timeline
Step 1: Establish the Window
First, determine the time bounds:
When did it start?
- First alert timestamp
- First metric anomaly
- First user report
When did it end?
- Alert resolved timestamp
- Metrics returned to normal
- Confirmed by verification
Buffer the window: Look 30-60 minutes before the first symptom. The cause often precedes visible symptoms.
Step 2: Gather Monitoring Data
Pull data from all relevant sources:
Metrics/Dashboards
What to capture:
- When did key metrics change?
- What was the magnitude of change?
- Which services were affected?
From Prometheus/Grafana:
- Screenshot dashboards at key moments
- Export metric data for the time window
- Note when thresholds were crossed
Alerts
What to capture:
- Alert fire and resolve times
- Which alerts triggered
- Alert severity and routing
From Alertmanager/PagerDuty:
- Alert notification timestamps
- Acknowledgment times
- Resolution times
Logs
What to capture:
- Error messages and timestamps
- First occurrence of unusual logs
- Log patterns during incident
From ELK/Loki/CloudWatch:
- Error log timestamps
- Stack traces
- Connection failures
Distributed Traces (if available)
What to capture:
- Failed request traces
- Latency breakdown
- Error propagation path
Step 3: Gather Change Data
Most incidents correlate with changes. Capture:
Deployments
git log --since="2024-01-15 14:00" --until="2024-01-15 15:00"
Or from CI/CD:
- Deployment timestamps
- What changed (commit hashes, PR links)
- Who deployed
Configuration Changes
- Feature flag changes
- Infrastructure scaling
- DNS or networking changes
- Third-party service changes
External Events
- Cloud provider incidents
- Upstream service issues
- Traffic spikes (marketing campaigns, press coverage)
Step 4: Gather Response Actions
Document what responders did:
- When was the incident acknowledged?
- What investigation steps were taken?
- What mitigations were attempted?
- What was the resolution action?
Source this from:
- Incident channel in Slack/Teams
- PagerDuty/Opsgenie timeline
- Responder notes
Step 5: Assemble Chronologically
Merge all events into a single timeline:
14:22:00 [DEPLOY] PR #456 merged - "Add caching to user service"
14:23:15 [DEPLOY] v2.3.1 deployed to production
14:23:30 [METRIC] user-service latency p99: 50ms → 200ms
14:23:45 [METRIC] Error rate: 0.1% → 2.5%
14:24:00 [ALERT] "High Error Rate - user-service" triggered
14:24:02 [ALERT] PagerDuty notification sent to on-call
14:25:15 [RESPONSE] @alice acknowledged in #incidents
14:25:30 [LOG] First "connection pool exhausted" errors
14:26:00 [RESPONSE] @alice: "Checking recent deploys"
14:27:30 [RESPONSE] @alice: "v2.3.1 looks suspicious, initiating rollback"
14:28:00 [DEPLOY] Rollback to v2.3.0 initiated
14:29:30 [DEPLOY] Rollback complete
14:30:00 [METRIC] Error rate: 2.5% → 0.1%
14:30:30 [ALERT] "High Error Rate - user-service" resolved
14:31:00 [RESPONSE] @alice: "Service verified healthy, closing incident"
Tools for Timeline Construction
Automated Timeline Tools
Grafana Annotations:
- Automatically mark deployments on dashboards
- Correlate visually with metric changes
PagerDuty/Opsgenie Timeline:
- Auto-captures alert lifecycle
- Response actions with timestamps
Datadog Events:
- Overlay events on metric graphs
- Automatic deployment tracking
Slack Timeline:
- Dedicated incident channels
- Timestamps on all messages
Manual Timeline Construction
When automation isn't available:
- Create a shared document (Google Doc, Notion)
- Assign a timeline keeper during incident
- Capture events as they happen
- Refine after resolution
Template:
# Incident Timeline: [Brief Description]
## Summary
- Start: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM
- End: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM
- Duration: X minutes
- Severity: P1/P2/P3
## Timeline
| Time (UTC) | Type | Event |
|------------|------|-------|
| HH:MM:SS | TYPE | Description |Analyzing the Timeline
Calculate Key Metrics
Time to Detect (TTD):
TTD = First alert time - Problem start time
Example: 14:24:00 - 14:23:45 = 15 seconds
Time to Respond (TTR):
TTR = First response - First alert
Example: 14:25:15 - 14:24:00 = 1 minute 15 seconds
Time to Mitigate (TTM):
TTM = Impact end - Impact start
Example: 14:30:00 - 14:23:45 = 6 minutes 15 seconds
Identify Gaps
Look for:
Detection gaps: Time between problem start and first alert
- Could detection be faster?
- Were there earlier warning signs?
Response gaps: Long pauses in the timeline
- What was happening during gaps?
- Were responders blocked?
Resolution gaps: Slow time from diagnosis to fix
- Could rollback be faster?
- Was the resolution obvious?
Find Patterns
Compare timelines across incidents:
- Do incidents follow similar patterns?
- Are the same services involved?
- Do certain change types correlate with incidents?
Best Practices
During the Incident
- Designate a timeline keeper (often the Incident Commander)
- Note timestamps, not just events ("14:27" not "just now")
- Capture uncertainty ("~14:25 - unsure exact time")
- Don't let timeline keeping slow response (rough notes are fine)
After the Incident
- Construct detailed timeline within 24 hours (while memories are fresh)
- Verify timestamps with monitoring data (humans misremember)
- Fill gaps from logs and metrics (automated data is objective)
- Get responder review (did we capture it correctly?)
For Postmortems
- Present timeline as foundation of postmortem
- Identify contributing factors at each step
- Look for counterfactual moments ("If X had happened differently...")
- Extract action items from timeline gaps
Example: Full Incident Timeline
# Incident: Payment Service Outage - 2024-01-15
## Impact
- Duration: 23 minutes
- Affected: 100% of payment processing
- Customer impact: ~450 failed transactions
## Timeline
### Pre-Incident
| Time (UTC) | Type | Event |
|------------|------|-------|
| 09:45:00 | DEPLOY | payment-service v3.2.0 deployed |
| 09:45:30 | METRIC | Deployment health check passed |
### Incident Start
| Time (UTC) | Type | Event |
|------------|------|-------|
| 10:12:15 | METRIC | payment-service memory usage: 60% → 85% |
| 10:14:00 | METRIC | Memory usage: 85% → 95% |
| 10:14:30 | METRIC | Error rate: 0.1% → 15% |
| 10:14:35 | ALERT | "High Memory - payment-service" triggered |
| 10:14:40 | ALERT | "High Error Rate - payment-service" triggered |
| 10:15:00 | EXTERNAL | First customer complaint via support |
### Response
| Time (UTC) | Type | Event |
|------------|------|-------|
| 10:15:30 | RESPONSE | @bob acknowledged alerts |
| 10:16:00 | RESPONSE | @bob opened incident channel |
| 10:17:00 | RESPONSE | @bob: "Memory leak suspected, checking recent changes" |
| 10:19:00 | RESPONSE | @bob: "v3.2.0 added new caching, likely cause" |
| 10:20:00 | ACTION | Rollback to v3.1.9 initiated |
| 10:22:00 | DEPLOY | Rollback complete |
### Resolution
| Time (UTC) | Type | Event |
|------------|------|-------|
| 10:25:00 | METRIC | Memory usage: 95% → 60% |
| 10:26:00 | METRIC | Error rate: 15% → 0.1% |
| 10:27:00 | ALERT | All alerts resolved |
| 10:30:00 | RESPONSE | @bob verified service healthy |
| 10:35:00 | RESPONSE | Incident closed |
## Analysis
- TTD: 2 min 20 sec (first symptom to alert)
- TTR: 55 sec (alert to acknowledgment)
- TTM: 14 min 45 sec (symptom start to recovery)
- Root cause: Memory leak in new caching layer
- Contributing factor: No memory profiling in stagingSummary
Building incident timelines from monitoring data:
Gather from multiple sources:
- Metrics and dashboards
- Alerts and notifications
- Logs and traces
- Change records (deploys, configs)
- Response actions
Assemble chronologically:
- Establish time window
- Merge all events
- Note timestamps precisely
- Fill gaps with monitoring data
Analyze for improvement:
- Calculate TTD, TTR, TTM
- Identify gaps and delays
- Find patterns across incidents
- Extract action items
Best practices:
- Capture during incident (rough notes)
- Refine within 24 hours
- Verify with automated data
- Use for postmortem foundation
The timeline transforms "something went wrong" into "here's exactly what happened." That clarity drives better response, better prevention, and better reliability.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an incident timeline?
An incident timeline is a chronological record of events during an incident: when problems started, what symptoms appeared, what actions were taken, and when resolution occurred. It's essential for understanding what happened and preventing recurrence.
How detailed should an incident timeline be?
Include events that affected the incident: alerts firing, metric changes, deployments, configuration changes, and response actions. Skip routine events that didn't contribute. The goal is understanding cause and effect.
When should you build an incident timeline?
Start during the incident (rough notes), then refine during postmortem. Don't wait—details fade quickly. Automated monitoring data provides objective timestamps that human memory can't match.
Related Articles
How to Reduce False Positive Alerts in Monitoring
False alerts cause alert fatigue and erode trust in monitoring. Learn practical techniques to reduce false positives and keep alerts meaningful.
Read moreWhat Is Mean Time to Detect (MTTD)?
Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) measures how long it takes to discover a problem after it starts. Learn how to calculate MTTD, why it matters, and how to improve it.
Read moreWhat Is Mean Time to Resolve (MTTR)?
Mean Time to Resolve (MTTR) measures how long it takes to fix a problem completely. Learn how to calculate MTTR, what affects it, and strategies to reduce it.
Read moreReady to monitor your uptime?
Start monitoring your websites, APIs, and services in minutes. Free forever for small projects.