Best Monitoring Tools for Self-Hosted Infrastructure
Self-hosted infrastructure needs monitoring that you control. Here are the best tools for teams running their own servers, whether on-premise or in the cloud.
Wakestack Team
Engineering Team
Why Self-Hosted Infrastructure Needs Different Monitoring
Self-hosted infrastructure—whether bare metal, on-premise VMs, or self-managed cloud—has specific monitoring requirements:
- Network topology: Your servers might be behind firewalls, NAT, or VPNs
- Control: You want to own your monitoring data
- No vendor dependency: If the monitoring vendor has issues, your monitoring shouldn't fail
- Custom environments: Non-standard setups that cloud tools don't handle well
- Cost at scale: Self-hosted can be cheaper for large deployments
Two Approaches: Self-Hosted Monitoring vs Cloud Agents
Self-Hosted Monitoring
Run the monitoring infrastructure yourself.
Pros:
- Full control over data
- No ongoing subscription
- Works in air-gapped environments
- No data leaving your network
Cons:
- You maintain it
- Monitoring can go down with infrastructure
- Requires expertise
Cloud Monitoring with Agents
Use a cloud service that installs agents on your servers.
Pros:
- No infrastructure to maintain
- External perspective catches issues
- Professional management
- Scales easily
Cons:
- Data leaves your network
- Subscription costs
- Vendor dependency
Many teams use both: self-hosted for internal visibility, cloud for external checks.
Best Self-Hosted Monitoring Tools
1. Prometheus + Grafana
Best for: Teams wanting the industry standard
The most popular open-source monitoring stack. Prometheus collects metrics, Grafana visualizes them.
Why it works for self-hosted:
- Runs entirely in your environment
- Pull-based (Prometheus scrapes targets)
- Massive ecosystem of exporters
- Battle-tested at scale
Setup complexity: Medium-High
What you get:
- Time-series metrics
- Powerful query language (PromQL)
- Extensive alerting
- Thousands of pre-built dashboards
Best for: Teams with ops experience who want flexibility.
2. Netdata
Best for: Beautiful monitoring with minimal setup
Netdata provides incredible out-of-the-box monitoring. Install it, and it auto-discovers everything.
Why it works for self-hosted:
- Single binary installation
- Auto-configures for your system
- Real-time, per-second metrics
- Minimal resource overhead
Setup complexity: Low
What you get:
- Instant visibility into everything
- Anomaly detection
- Health monitoring and alerts
- Parent-child streaming for central view
Best for: Teams wanting quick results without configuration.
3. Zabbix
Best for: Enterprise-grade self-hosted monitoring
Zabbix is a full-featured monitoring solution used by large enterprises worldwide.
Why it works for self-hosted:
- Proven at massive scale
- Agent and agentless options
- Network device monitoring
- Extensive template library
Setup complexity: High
What you get:
- Complete monitoring platform
- Network discovery
- Distributed monitoring
- Maps and topology views
Best for: Larger environments with complex requirements.
4. Checkmk
Best for: IT infrastructure monitoring
Checkmk evolved from Nagios and provides comprehensive infrastructure monitoring.
Why it works for self-hosted:
- Raw Edition is open source
- Automatic service discovery
- Good for mixed environments
- Enterprise features available
Setup complexity: Medium
What you get:
- Server monitoring
- Network monitoring
- Application monitoring
- Business intelligence views
Best for: Traditional IT environments with diverse infrastructure.
5. Uptime Kuma
Best for: Simple uptime monitoring, self-hosted
If you primarily need uptime/availability monitoring, Uptime Kuma is refreshingly simple.
Why it works for self-hosted:
- Single Docker container
- Beautiful, simple interface
- Status pages included
- Active community
Setup complexity: Very Low
What you get:
- HTTP/TCP/Ping monitoring
- Status pages
- Notifications
- Basic dashboards
Best for: Teams who need uptime checks without complexity.
Best Cloud Tools for Self-Hosted Servers
1. Wakestack
Best for: Simple agent-based monitoring from the cloud
Install an agent on your self-hosted servers, see metrics in the cloud. Simple, focused, affordable.
Why it works for self-hosted:
- Agent works anywhere with internet
- No infrastructure to maintain
- External perspective on availability
- Combined server + uptime monitoring
What you get:
- Server metrics (CPU, memory, disk, network)
- Uptime monitoring
- Status pages
- Alerting
Pricing: Scales with hosts
2. Grafana Cloud
Best for: Managed Prometheus without self-hosting
Get the Prometheus/Grafana stack without running it yourself.
Why it works for self-hosted:
- Agents push to cloud
- No Prometheus server to maintain
- Free tier available
- Full Grafana features
What you get:
- Metrics, logs, traces storage
- Grafana dashboards
- Alerting
- Synthetic monitoring
Pricing: Free tier, then usage-based
3. Datadog
Best for: Comprehensive monitoring (if budget allows)
Datadog agents work on any server. Excellent product, enterprise pricing.
Why it works for self-hosted:
- Agent installs anywhere
- Extensive integrations
- Strong container/Kubernetes support
- Unified metrics, logs, traces
What you get:
- Full observability platform
- 500+ integrations
- Advanced analytics
Pricing: Per-host, can be expensive
Comparison Matrix
| Tool | Type | Setup | Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prometheus + Grafana | Self-hosted | Medium-High | Free | Flexibility, standard |
| Netdata | Self-hosted | Low | Free | Quick, beautiful |
| Zabbix | Self-hosted | High | Free | Enterprise scale |
| Checkmk | Self-hosted | Medium | Free/Paid | IT infrastructure |
| Uptime Kuma | Self-hosted | Very Low | Free | Uptime only |
| Wakestack | Cloud agent | Very Low | $ | Simple server monitoring |
| Grafana Cloud | Cloud | Low | $/Free | Managed Prometheus |
| Datadog | Cloud agent | Low | $$$ | Full observability |
Architecture Considerations
Internal vs External Monitoring
Internal monitoring (self-hosted):
- Sees inside your network
- Monitors internal services
- No external dependencies
- Can fail with infrastructure
External monitoring (cloud):
- User perspective
- Verifies external accessibility
- Independent of your infrastructure
- Can't see internal services
Recommendation: Use both. Internal for depth, external for availability.
Agent Communication
For self-hosted servers with cloud monitoring:
Agent pulls (e.g., Prometheus):
- Monitoring server initiates connection
- Works when monitoring server can reach targets
- Harder through firewalls
Agent pushes (e.g., most cloud tools):
- Agent initiates outbound connection
- Works through firewalls/NAT
- Agent needs internet access
For self-hosted servers behind firewalls, push-based agents are easier.
High Availability
Self-hosted monitoring should be more reliable than what it monitors:
- Run monitoring on separate infrastructure
- Consider redundant monitoring servers
- Always have external checks as backup
Implementation Recommendations
Minimal Self-Hosted Setup
If you want self-hosted monitoring quickly:
- Install Netdata on each server
- Configure parent node for central view
- Set up alerts to Slack/email
- Add Uptime Kuma for external checks
Total setup time: 1-2 hours.
Production Self-Hosted Setup
For more robust monitoring:
- Deploy Prometheus (or Victoria Metrics)
- Install node_exporter on servers
- Set up Grafana for visualization
- Configure Alertmanager
- Add Uptime Kuma or cloud uptime monitoring
Total setup time: 4-8 hours.
Hybrid Approach
Best of both worlds:
- Self-hosted: Prometheus + Grafana for internal metrics
- Cloud: Wakestack or Better Stack for external uptime
- Benefit: Internal depth + external verification
Summary
For self-hosted infrastructure:
Self-hosted monitoring tools:
- Prometheus + Grafana: Industry standard, flexible
- Netdata: Quick setup, beautiful dashboards
- Zabbix: Enterprise scale
- Uptime Kuma: Simple uptime monitoring
Cloud monitoring for self-hosted servers:
- Wakestack: Simple, affordable server + uptime
- Grafana Cloud: Managed Prometheus
- Datadog: Comprehensive (expensive)
Best approach: Combine internal monitoring (depth) with external monitoring (availability). Self-hosted tools give you control; cloud tools give you external perspective.
The goal is reliable visibility into your infrastructure—choose the approach that your team can maintain.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I self-host my monitoring tool?
It depends on your team's capacity. Self-hosted monitoring gives you control and avoids vendor lock-in, but requires maintenance. If you're already managing servers, adding monitoring infrastructure is incremental work.
Can cloud monitoring tools monitor self-hosted servers?
Yes. Most cloud monitoring services offer agents that run on any server—cloud, on-premise, or colocation. You don't need self-hosted monitoring just because your servers are self-hosted.
What's the main risk of self-hosted monitoring?
If your monitoring server goes down with your infrastructure, you won't know there's a problem. Always have external checks (even basic uptime monitoring) from outside your infrastructure.
Related Articles
Best Monitoring Tools for Small Infrastructure Teams
Small teams need monitoring that provides visibility without requiring a dedicated ops person. Here are the best tools for teams of 1-10 engineers.
Read moreBest Server Monitoring Tools Without Enterprise Bloat
Enterprise monitoring tools are powerful but overwhelming. Here are the best server monitoring tools that focus on what matters without the complexity.
Read moreWhat Is Agent-Based Monitoring? Pros, Cons, and Examples
Agent-based monitoring uses software installed on servers to collect metrics. Learn what it is, how it compares to agentless monitoring, and when to use each approach.
Read moreReady to monitor your uptime?
Start monitoring your websites, APIs, and services in minutes. Free forever for small projects.