Back to Blog
Comparisons
self-hosted
infrastructure monitoring

Best Monitoring Tools for Self-Hosted Infrastructure

Self-hosted infrastructure needs monitoring that you control. Here are the best tools for teams running their own servers, whether on-premise or in the cloud.

WT

Wakestack Team

Engineering Team

7 min read

Why Self-Hosted Infrastructure Needs Different Monitoring

Self-hosted infrastructure—whether bare metal, on-premise VMs, or self-managed cloud—has specific monitoring requirements:

  • Network topology: Your servers might be behind firewalls, NAT, or VPNs
  • Control: You want to own your monitoring data
  • No vendor dependency: If the monitoring vendor has issues, your monitoring shouldn't fail
  • Custom environments: Non-standard setups that cloud tools don't handle well
  • Cost at scale: Self-hosted can be cheaper for large deployments

Two Approaches: Self-Hosted Monitoring vs Cloud Agents

Self-Hosted Monitoring

Run the monitoring infrastructure yourself.

Pros:

  • Full control over data
  • No ongoing subscription
  • Works in air-gapped environments
  • No data leaving your network

Cons:

  • You maintain it
  • Monitoring can go down with infrastructure
  • Requires expertise

Cloud Monitoring with Agents

Use a cloud service that installs agents on your servers.

Pros:

  • No infrastructure to maintain
  • External perspective catches issues
  • Professional management
  • Scales easily

Cons:

  • Data leaves your network
  • Subscription costs
  • Vendor dependency

Many teams use both: self-hosted for internal visibility, cloud for external checks.

Best Self-Hosted Monitoring Tools

1. Prometheus + Grafana

Best for: Teams wanting the industry standard

The most popular open-source monitoring stack. Prometheus collects metrics, Grafana visualizes them.

Why it works for self-hosted:

  • Runs entirely in your environment
  • Pull-based (Prometheus scrapes targets)
  • Massive ecosystem of exporters
  • Battle-tested at scale

Setup complexity: Medium-High

What you get:

  • Time-series metrics
  • Powerful query language (PromQL)
  • Extensive alerting
  • Thousands of pre-built dashboards

Best for: Teams with ops experience who want flexibility.

2. Netdata

Best for: Beautiful monitoring with minimal setup

Netdata provides incredible out-of-the-box monitoring. Install it, and it auto-discovers everything.

Why it works for self-hosted:

  • Single binary installation
  • Auto-configures for your system
  • Real-time, per-second metrics
  • Minimal resource overhead

Setup complexity: Low

What you get:

  • Instant visibility into everything
  • Anomaly detection
  • Health monitoring and alerts
  • Parent-child streaming for central view

Best for: Teams wanting quick results without configuration.

3. Zabbix

Best for: Enterprise-grade self-hosted monitoring

Zabbix is a full-featured monitoring solution used by large enterprises worldwide.

Why it works for self-hosted:

  • Proven at massive scale
  • Agent and agentless options
  • Network device monitoring
  • Extensive template library

Setup complexity: High

What you get:

  • Complete monitoring platform
  • Network discovery
  • Distributed monitoring
  • Maps and topology views

Best for: Larger environments with complex requirements.

4. Checkmk

Best for: IT infrastructure monitoring

Checkmk evolved from Nagios and provides comprehensive infrastructure monitoring.

Why it works for self-hosted:

  • Raw Edition is open source
  • Automatic service discovery
  • Good for mixed environments
  • Enterprise features available

Setup complexity: Medium

What you get:

  • Server monitoring
  • Network monitoring
  • Application monitoring
  • Business intelligence views

Best for: Traditional IT environments with diverse infrastructure.

5. Uptime Kuma

Best for: Simple uptime monitoring, self-hosted

If you primarily need uptime/availability monitoring, Uptime Kuma is refreshingly simple.

Why it works for self-hosted:

  • Single Docker container
  • Beautiful, simple interface
  • Status pages included
  • Active community

Setup complexity: Very Low

What you get:

  • HTTP/TCP/Ping monitoring
  • Status pages
  • Notifications
  • Basic dashboards

Best for: Teams who need uptime checks without complexity.

Best Cloud Tools for Self-Hosted Servers

1. Wakestack

Best for: Simple agent-based monitoring from the cloud

Install an agent on your self-hosted servers, see metrics in the cloud. Simple, focused, affordable.

Why it works for self-hosted:

  • Agent works anywhere with internet
  • No infrastructure to maintain
  • External perspective on availability
  • Combined server + uptime monitoring

What you get:

  • Server metrics (CPU, memory, disk, network)
  • Uptime monitoring
  • Status pages
  • Alerting

Pricing: Scales with hosts

2. Grafana Cloud

Best for: Managed Prometheus without self-hosting

Get the Prometheus/Grafana stack without running it yourself.

Why it works for self-hosted:

  • Agents push to cloud
  • No Prometheus server to maintain
  • Free tier available
  • Full Grafana features

What you get:

  • Metrics, logs, traces storage
  • Grafana dashboards
  • Alerting
  • Synthetic monitoring

Pricing: Free tier, then usage-based

3. Datadog

Best for: Comprehensive monitoring (if budget allows)

Datadog agents work on any server. Excellent product, enterprise pricing.

Why it works for self-hosted:

  • Agent installs anywhere
  • Extensive integrations
  • Strong container/Kubernetes support
  • Unified metrics, logs, traces

What you get:

  • Full observability platform
  • 500+ integrations
  • Advanced analytics

Pricing: Per-host, can be expensive

Comparison Matrix

ToolTypeSetupCostBest For
Prometheus + GrafanaSelf-hostedMedium-HighFreeFlexibility, standard
NetdataSelf-hostedLowFreeQuick, beautiful
ZabbixSelf-hostedHighFreeEnterprise scale
CheckmkSelf-hostedMediumFree/PaidIT infrastructure
Uptime KumaSelf-hostedVery LowFreeUptime only
WakestackCloud agentVery Low$Simple server monitoring
Grafana CloudCloudLow$/FreeManaged Prometheus
DatadogCloud agentLow$$$Full observability

Architecture Considerations

Internal vs External Monitoring

Internal monitoring (self-hosted):

  • Sees inside your network
  • Monitors internal services
  • No external dependencies
  • Can fail with infrastructure

External monitoring (cloud):

  • User perspective
  • Verifies external accessibility
  • Independent of your infrastructure
  • Can't see internal services

Recommendation: Use both. Internal for depth, external for availability.

Agent Communication

For self-hosted servers with cloud monitoring:

Agent pulls (e.g., Prometheus):

  • Monitoring server initiates connection
  • Works when monitoring server can reach targets
  • Harder through firewalls

Agent pushes (e.g., most cloud tools):

  • Agent initiates outbound connection
  • Works through firewalls/NAT
  • Agent needs internet access

For self-hosted servers behind firewalls, push-based agents are easier.

High Availability

Self-hosted monitoring should be more reliable than what it monitors:

  • Run monitoring on separate infrastructure
  • Consider redundant monitoring servers
  • Always have external checks as backup

Implementation Recommendations

Minimal Self-Hosted Setup

If you want self-hosted monitoring quickly:

  1. Install Netdata on each server
  2. Configure parent node for central view
  3. Set up alerts to Slack/email
  4. Add Uptime Kuma for external checks

Total setup time: 1-2 hours.

Production Self-Hosted Setup

For more robust monitoring:

  1. Deploy Prometheus (or Victoria Metrics)
  2. Install node_exporter on servers
  3. Set up Grafana for visualization
  4. Configure Alertmanager
  5. Add Uptime Kuma or cloud uptime monitoring

Total setup time: 4-8 hours.

Hybrid Approach

Best of both worlds:

  1. Self-hosted: Prometheus + Grafana for internal metrics
  2. Cloud: Wakestack or Better Stack for external uptime
  3. Benefit: Internal depth + external verification

Summary

For self-hosted infrastructure:

Self-hosted monitoring tools:

  • Prometheus + Grafana: Industry standard, flexible
  • Netdata: Quick setup, beautiful dashboards
  • Zabbix: Enterprise scale
  • Uptime Kuma: Simple uptime monitoring

Cloud monitoring for self-hosted servers:

  • Wakestack: Simple, affordable server + uptime
  • Grafana Cloud: Managed Prometheus
  • Datadog: Comprehensive (expensive)

Best approach: Combine internal monitoring (depth) with external monitoring (availability). Self-hosted tools give you control; cloud tools give you external perspective.

The goal is reliable visibility into your infrastructure—choose the approach that your team can maintain.

About the Author

WT

Wakestack Team

Engineering Team

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I self-host my monitoring tool?

It depends on your team's capacity. Self-hosted monitoring gives you control and avoids vendor lock-in, but requires maintenance. If you're already managing servers, adding monitoring infrastructure is incremental work.

Can cloud monitoring tools monitor self-hosted servers?

Yes. Most cloud monitoring services offer agents that run on any server—cloud, on-premise, or colocation. You don't need self-hosted monitoring just because your servers are self-hosted.

What's the main risk of self-hosted monitoring?

If your monitoring server goes down with your infrastructure, you won't know there's a problem. Always have external checks (even basic uptime monitoring) from outside your infrastructure.

Related Articles

Ready to monitor your uptime?

Start monitoring your websites, APIs, and services in minutes. Free forever for small projects.